Albert Zennou: “Emmanuel Macron and the limits of performative speech”

Reserved for subscribers
CHRONICLE - Last Tuesday evening, the head of state engaged in a televised exercise in which he remained at the level of rhetoric without any real desire to act. Without real, deliberate action, political discourse remains suspended, without a basis in reality. This fatigue with public speaking among the French also generates democratic fatigue.
In the beginning was the word. Certainly, words can be creative; they can initiate, construct, and give life to an idea, a project, a program. Words may be at the beginning, but for a politician, especially when they exercise power, their words must be followed by real, measurable, quantifiable, and concrete effects. Performative speech is essential. Tuesday evening, on TF1, Emmanuel Macron stuck to words. The only problem: he is not at the beginning of his term. Eight years after his election, he has transformed himself into a commentator on his own presidency and, sometimes, his own impotence.
Since ancient Greece and Rome, speech has shaped political life. The agora, the Roman assembly, and since the modern era, parliaments, have given speeches and rhetoric a special place. Tribunes have left their mark on history with their voices. As Hannah Arendt wrote: for a politician, speaking means making oneself visible. And it is in this way that…
This article is reserved for subscribers. You have 85% left to discover.
lefigaro